UBS analysts have issued a stark warning for Tesla investors, maintaining a “sell” rating on the electric vehicle maker’s stock with a price target of $226 per share—implying a significant 35% downside from its Monday trading price of around $353. Despite Tesla’s impressive 40% surge following Donald Trump’s election victory in early November, the investment bank argues that the company’s fundamentals don’t support its current valuation.
The recent rally has been fueled by investor optimism surrounding Elon Musk’s close ties to President-elect Trump and expectations of favorable regulatory changes. Market participants are betting that the Trump administration could eliminate EV tax credits (which would primarily hurt Tesla’s competitors), loosen AI regulations, and potentially end investigations into Tesla’s full self-driving (FSD) software. These developments have helped Tesla reclaim its $1 trillion valuation, adding approximately $350 million to its market cap post-election.
However, UBS analysts characterize the stock surge as driven by “animal spirits/momentum” rather than solid business fundamentals. The firm’s analysis reveals troubling implications of Tesla’s current valuation: to justify current stock prices, Tesla would need to deliver 15.5 million vehicles annually by 2030—more than triple Wall Street’s consensus estimate of 4.8 million deliveries. Similarly, Tesla’s energy storage business would need to reach 780 gigawatt hours by 2030, over five times the expected 134 gigawatt hours.
The bank also questions whether Trump’s presidency will truly benefit Tesla as much as investors believe. Eliminating the EV tax credit could force Tesla to resume aggressive price cuts, potentially hurting margins. Additionally, UBS points to a concerning historical pattern: Tesla’s automotive business currently represents just 12% of its total market capitalization. When this metric has previously fallen to around 10%, the stock has experienced corrections exceeding 30% and even 70%.
UBS isn’t alone in its cautious stance. JPMorgan previously forecasted up to 48% downside for Tesla shares before the election, citing “stalled automotive growth.” The UBS note emphasizes that Tesla’s robotaxi business would need to gain around $300 billion in value to justify current prices—a ambitious target that depends heavily on AI breakthroughs and regulatory approvals for autonomous driving technology.
Key Quotes
Thus, the rise in Tesla stock is mostly driven by animal spirits/momentum (which has happened multiple times in TSLA’s history)
UBS analysts used this characterization to explain Tesla’s post-election rally, suggesting the stock surge is based on speculation and momentum rather than fundamental business improvements—a pattern they note has occurred repeatedly in Tesla’s trading history.
We urge investors to think about what one needs to believe in adding to TSLA position at current levels.
This warning from UBS analysts challenges investors to critically evaluate the assumptions underlying Tesla’s valuation, particularly regarding AI-driven robotaxis and autonomous driving capabilities that would need to generate hundreds of billions in value.
The prior two times that metric has hit ~10%, we’ve seen corrections of >30% and >70%
UBS analysts highlighted this historical pattern regarding Tesla’s automotive business as a percentage of total market cap, warning that the current 12% level is approaching a danger zone that has previously triggered major stock corrections.
Our Take
Tesla’s situation exemplifies the AI valuation paradox: companies with AI ambitions trade at multiples that assume revolutionary breakthroughs, yet the technology often remains years from profitable deployment. The $300 billion robotaxi valuation embedded in Tesla’s stock price requires not just AI advances but regulatory approval, infrastructure development, and consumer adoption—all highly uncertain. What’s particularly striking is how political connections have become a proxy for AI progress in investor minds. The assumption that Trump-era deregulation will accelerate Tesla’s AI capabilities confuses regulatory environment with technological capability. UBS’s analysis serves as a reality check, forcing investors to confront whether Tesla’s AI promises—from full self-driving to robotaxis—can possibly deliver the exponential growth already priced into the stock. This disconnect between AI hype and automotive reality may signal broader market recalibration ahead for AI-dependent valuations.
Why This Matters
This analysis highlights a critical disconnect between AI-driven market enthusiasm and business fundamentals in the autonomous vehicle sector. Tesla’s valuation increasingly depends on speculative AI technologies—particularly its full self-driving capabilities and robotaxi ambitions—rather than its core automotive business. The fact that Tesla’s car business represents only 12% of its market cap underscores how much investors are betting on AI and autonomous driving breakthroughs that haven’t yet materialized at scale.
The story reflects broader trends in AI investment, where regulatory expectations and technological promises can drive valuations far beyond current revenue streams. Tesla’s situation demonstrates the risks of AI hype cycles, where political connections and deregulation hopes inflate stock prices without corresponding improvements in AI product delivery or adoption. For the AI industry, this serves as a cautionary tale about the gap between AI aspirations and commercial reality, particularly in highly regulated sectors like autonomous vehicles. The potential 35% correction would signal that markets are beginning to demand tangible AI results rather than accepting promises alone.
Recommended Reading
For those interested in learning more about artificial intelligence, machine learning, and effective AI communication, here are some excellent resources: