OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has publicly responded to Anthropic’s Super Bowl advertising campaign, which takes direct aim at ChatGPT’s decision to introduce advertising. In a lengthy X post on Wednesday, Altman acknowledged the humor in the ads while simultaneously criticizing them as “clearly dishonest” and “deceptive.”
Anthropic launched four ads online Wednesday that are set to air during the Super Bowl on Sunday. The campaign features a tagline stating “Ads are coming to AI. But not to Claude,” positioning Anthropic’s Claude chatbot as an ad-free alternative to ChatGPT. The ads depict a human actor playing a fictional chatbot who awkwardly interrupts conversations to push products, including one scenario where a user asking about achieving a six-pack receives unsolicited suggestions for shoe insoles with a discount code.
Altman defended OpenAI’s advertising strategy, emphasizing that the company would never implement ads in the intrusive manner depicted in Anthropic’s campaign. “Our most important principle for ads says that we won’t do exactly this; we would obviously never run ads in the way Anthropic depicts them. We are not stupid and we know our users would reject that,” he wrote. He framed OpenAI’s decision to introduce advertising as part of a broader mission to democratize AI access, stating that the company believes “everyone deserves access to AI” and is focused on bringing the technology to billions of people who cannot afford subscription fees.
The pricing structures of both companies differ significantly. OpenAI offers ChatGPT plans ranging from free to $200 monthly for individuals, plus team and enterprise options. Anthropic’s Claude pricing ranges from free to $100 monthly for individual users, also with team and enterprise tiers available. Altman highlighted the scale difference between the platforms, claiming that “more Texans use ChatGPT for free than total people use Claude in the US,” suggesting OpenAI faces different challenges due to its larger user base. He characterized Anthropic as serving “an expensive product to rich people.”
Anthropic did not respond to Business Insider’s request for comment on Altman’s criticisms. Meanwhile, Altman announced that OpenAI would run its own Super Bowl advertisement focused on “builders, and how anyone can now build anything,” taking a different marketing approach that emphasizes empowerment rather than competitive attacks.
Key Quotes
First, the good part of the Anthropic ads: they are funny, and I laughed. But I wonder why Anthropic would go for something so clearly dishonest.
Sam Altman, OpenAI’s CEO, opened his response by acknowledging the humor in Anthropic’s campaign while immediately pivoting to criticism, setting the tone for his defense of ChatGPT’s advertising strategy.
Our most important principle for ads says that we won’t do exactly this; we would obviously never run ads in the way Anthropic depicts them. We are not stupid and we know our users would reject that.
Altman directly refuted Anthropic’s portrayal of intrusive AI advertising, emphasizing that OpenAI understands user expectations and would not implement the jarring, mid-conversation product placements shown in the competitor’s ads.
More Texans use ChatGPT for free than total people use Claude in the US, so we have a differently-shaped problem than they do.
Altman highlighted the scale difference between the two platforms, suggesting that OpenAI’s massive user base creates unique challenges that justify its advertising approach, while implying Anthropic serves a smaller, more affluent audience.
Anthropic serves an expensive product to rich people.
In perhaps his sharpest criticism, Altman characterized Anthropic’s business model as elitist, contrasting it with OpenAI’s stated mission to democratize AI access through free, ad-supported options alongside premium subscriptions.
Our Take
This public spat reveals deeper strategic divides in the AI industry beyond simple competitive posturing. Altman’s defensive response suggests Anthropic’s ads struck a nerve, likely because they tap into legitimate user concerns about AI commercialization. The fact that both companies are investing in Super Bowl advertising demonstrates how quickly generative AI has moved from niche technology to mass-market product, with billions of dollars and mainstream adoption at stake.
The monetization debate is critical for AI’s future trajectory. If advertising becomes the dominant model, it could democratize access but potentially compromise the quality and objectivity of AI responses. Conversely, subscription-only models may create a two-tiered AI ecosystem where advanced capabilities remain accessible only to those who can afford premium pricing. Neither company has fully solved this tension, and their competing approaches will likely coexist as the market matures and differentiates.
Why This Matters
This public feud between two AI industry giants highlights the intensifying competition in the generative AI market and reveals fundamental disagreements about business models and accessibility. As AI chatbots become mainstream consumer products, the debate over monetization strategies—subscriptions versus advertising—will shape how billions of users experience these technologies.
The controversy underscores growing concerns about AI commercialization. Anthropic’s aggressive marketing positions it as the privacy-conscious, user-first alternative, while OpenAI defends advertising as necessary for democratizing access. This tension between premium, ad-free experiences and free, ad-supported models mirrors debates that have played out across social media and streaming platforms.
The Super Bowl advertising battle signals AI’s arrival as a mass-market technology. When AI companies invest in premium advertising slots during one of the year’s most-watched events, it demonstrates that generative AI has moved beyond early adopters to compete for mainstream consumer attention. How these companies balance revenue generation with user experience will influence public trust in AI systems and determine which platforms dominate the next phase of the AI revolution.
Related Stories
- OpenAI Lost Nearly Half of Its AI Safety Team, Ex-Researcher Says
- Sam Altman and Jony Ive Partner on AI Device, Target $1B Funding
- Elon Musk’s $97B OpenAI Bid: Strategic Move or Elaborate Troll?
- OpenAI’s Competition Sparks Investor Anxiety Over Talent Retention at Microsoft, Meta, and Google
- Meta Q4 Earnings: Zuckerberg Bets Big on AI with $135B Capex Plan