The rise of autonomous robotaxis is poised to significantly impact the earnings of Uber and Lyft drivers across the United States, according to ride-hailing experts and AI researchers. While the immediate effects remain minimal, the long-term implications could be substantial as AI-powered driverless technology becomes more affordable and widespread.
Carl Benedikt Frey, a professor of AI and work at the Oxford Internet Institute, told Business Insider that robotaxis like Waymo One haven’t yet materially impacted driver earnings in current markets. However, he warns that as the technology improves and prices decrease, drivers will “feel it in their wallets.” Frey draws parallels to Uber’s initial disruption of traditional taxi services, which reduced taxi driver earnings by approximately 10%.
The robotaxi landscape is rapidly evolving, with Waymo One leading the charge by providing over 100,000 weekly rides across Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Phoenix. The company recently announced expansions to Atlanta and Austin through exclusive partnerships with Uber. Beyond Waymo, major players including Tesla, Amazon-owned Zoox, and Chinese company Apollo Go are developing their own autonomous taxi services.
Andrew Garin, an assistant professor of economics at Carnegie Mellon University, explains that increased vehicle supply will inevitably lower market prices for ride-hailing services. This poses particular challenges for part-time drivers who rely on ride-hailing as a valuable side hustle, though many don’t depend on it as their primary income source.
Despite the technological momentum, experts caution that widespread robotaxi adoption won’t happen overnight. Sergio Avedian, an Uber driver and senior contributor to The Rideshare Guy, estimates it will take at least a decade for robotaxi companies to significantly reduce operating costs and scale their fleets. Analysts from Bernstein Research estimate that 350,000 to 400,000 robotaxis would be needed to effectively replace current US ride-hailing networks—a stark contrast to Waymo’s current fleet of approximately 700 vehicles.
Regulatory hurdles, safety concerns, and consumer preferences for human drivers may slow adoption. Additionally, challenging weather conditions in many US cities could delay expansion beyond favorable markets like Los Angeles and Phoenix. Nicole Moore, president of Rideshare Drivers United, identifies airport trips—currently restricted for robotaxis in many markets—as a critical “bread and butter” revenue source that drivers fear losing.
Key Quotes
When prices start coming down, as the technology gets better and cheaper, drivers will feel it in their wallets. We’ve seen this movie before. When Uber first showed up, it reduced traditional taxi drivers’ earnings by about 10%.
Carl Benedikt Frey, professor of AI and work at the Oxford Internet Institute, draws parallels between the current robotaxi disruption and Uber’s initial impact on traditional taxi services, warning that history is repeating itself with AI-powered vehicles.
If there are more cars on the street to give rides, an increasing supply lowers the market price for working.
Andrew Garin, assistant professor of economics at Carnegie Mellon University, explains the basic economic principle that will drive down driver earnings as autonomous vehicles increase supply in the ride-hailing market.
Long-term, definitely it’s going to be a threat, and that’s why we suggest everybody not treat Uber and Lyft driving as a career.
Sergio Avedian, an Uber driver and senior contributor to The Rideshare Guy, acknowledges the inevitable long-term threat while estimating it will take at least a decade for robotaxis to significantly scale up and reduce costs.
I feel like for the past 20 years, we’ve been saying, ‘In five years, there’ll be autonomous vehicles everywhere,’ and then five years pass, and we’re still waiting.
Lindsey Cameron, assistant professor at Wharton School, provides a reality check on the autonomous vehicle industry’s history of overpromising and underdelivering, suggesting the disruption may take longer than anticipated.
Our Take
This article captures the gradual but inevitable displacement that AI brings to labor markets. What’s particularly striking is the measured timeline—experts suggest a decade or more for significant disruption, yet the direction is clear and irreversible. The comparison to Uber’s 10% reduction in taxi driver earnings is telling; AI-powered robotaxis represent a second wave of disruption to the same workforce.
The global dimension is crucial: China’s Apollo Go producing cheaper autonomous vehicles could accelerate the timeline dramatically, much as Chinese manufacturing has disrupted other industries. The gap between Waymo’s 700 vehicles and the estimated 350,000-400,000 needed for full replacement seems vast, but exponential scaling in tech often defies linear projections. For gig workers, the message is unambiguous: diversification and reskilling aren’t optional but essential survival strategies in an AI-driven economy.
Why This Matters
This story represents a pivotal moment in AI’s disruption of the labor market, particularly within the gig economy. The robotaxi revolution exemplifies how artificial intelligence and autonomous technology are moving from theoretical concerns to tangible threats for millions of workers. With ride-hailing platforms employing substantial portions of the gig workforce, the gradual replacement of human drivers with AI-powered vehicles could have far-reaching economic and social consequences.
The development highlights the classic pattern of technological displacement: initial coexistence followed by gradual erosion of earning opportunities as AI systems become more cost-effective. This mirrors historical disruptions but at an accelerated pace due to AI’s rapid advancement. The story also reveals the global competitive dynamics in autonomous vehicle technology, with Chinese companies like Apollo Go producing cheaper alternatives that could accelerate adoption.
For businesses, this signals the maturation of autonomous vehicle technology from experimental to commercially viable. For workers, it underscores the urgency of treating gig work as transitional rather than career-focused employment. The regulatory and safety challenges mentioned also demonstrate that AI deployment isn’t just a technical issue but requires careful policy consideration to balance innovation with workforce protection.
Recommended Reading
For those interested in learning more about artificial intelligence, machine learning, and effective AI communication, here are some excellent resources: