The article discusses the potential discriminatory nature of opposition to universal basic income (UBI), a policy that would provide a regular cash payment to all citizens. According to Scott Santens, a prominent UBI advocate, arguments against UBI often rely on stereotypes and biases against certain groups perceived as undeserving or lazy. Santens argues that means-testing and work requirements for social assistance programs can perpetuate discrimination and stigma. He contends that a UBI, being unconditional and universal, would eliminate such biases and provide a more equitable safety net. The article also explores the potential benefits of a UBI, such as reducing poverty, promoting entrepreneurship, and simplifying the social welfare system. However, critics argue that a UBI could discourage work and be prohibitively expensive. The article presents both sides of the debate but ultimately suggests that opposition to UBI may be rooted in discriminatory attitudes towards marginalized groups.