Over 100 documents containing texts, emails, and diary entries from Silicon Valley’s most influential tech executives were unsealed on Tuesday as part of Elon Musk’s lawsuit against OpenAI and CEO Sam Altman. The revelations provide unprecedented insight into the power struggles and strategic decisions that shaped one of the world’s most prominent AI companies.
Musk filed the lawsuit in 2024, alleging that OpenAI executives misled him when they transitioned the company from its original nonprofit mission to a profit-oriented structure. The billionaire claims he donated $38 million to OpenAI when it was founded as a nonprofit organization. OpenAI has denied these allegations, stating Musk was aware of the company’s plans to shift to a for-profit model. “Mr. Musk’s lawsuit continues to be baseless and a part of his ongoing pattern of harassment,” an OpenAI spokesperson said.
A California federal judge ruled Wednesday that there was sufficient evidence for a jury to consider Musk’s claims, setting up a March 2025 trial between the two tech titans.
The unsealed documents reveal fascinating details about OpenAI’s early days. Greg Brockman’s private diary entries show the cofounder debating whether to break away from Musk’s influence, writing “This is the only chance we have to get out from Elon. Is he the ‘glorious leader’ that I would pick?” Brockman also contemplated funding sources, noting “We can get it from Tesla, probably. We could also probably get it from Google.”
Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella features prominently in the documents, including revelations that he invested in Musk’s Neuralink and was working on an AI book titled “An Inflection Point: Mission, transformation, and the dawn of next generation AI” with Harvard professor Marco Iansiti, though it was never published.
The documents show Musk warned in 2018 that “OpenAI is on a path of certain failure relative to Google,” and pushed the company to partner with Microsoft over Amazon, calling Jeff Bezos “a bit of a tool.” Musk left OpenAI’s board in February 2018, citing potential conflicts with Tesla’s AI work.
During the November 2023 board crisis when Altman was briefly ousted, then-CTO Mira Murati texted Nadella urgently requesting public support, warning “It’s very important that we don’t lose researchers to Demis or Elon.” In a poignant February 2023 exchange, Altman told Musk “it really fucking hurts when you publicly attack openai,” to which Musk responded that “the fate of civilization is at stake.”
Key Quotes
This is the only chance we have to get out from Elon. Is he the ‘glorious leader’ that I would pick?
OpenAI cofounder Greg Brockman wrote this in his private diary while debating whether to break away from Musk’s influence. The entry reveals internal tensions about Musk’s leadership style and the company’s future direction during its critical early years.
OpenAI is on a path of certain failure relative to Google. There obviously needs to be immediate and dramatic action or everyone except for Google will be consigned to irrelevance.
Elon Musk wrote this in a January 2018 email to Sam Altman, just weeks before leaving OpenAI’s board. The warning highlights Musk’s concerns about OpenAI’s competitive position and foreshadows his departure from the organization he helped found.
it really fucking hurts when you publicly attack openai.
Sam Altman sent this text to Musk in February 2023, expressing personal pain over Musk’s public criticism of the company. Musk responded by apologizing but insisting “the fate of civilization is at stake,” revealing the deep personal and philosophical rift between the two AI leaders.
It’s very important that we don’t lose researchers to Demis or Elon. The technical team is being dragged in so many recruiting directions and a unified front would help immensely.
Mira Murati, then OpenAI’s CTO, texted this to Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella during the November 2023 crisis when Altman was ousted. The message reveals concerns about talent retention and competition from Google DeepMind’s Demis Hassabis and Musk’s AI ventures.
Our Take
This legal battle represents more than a dispute between billionaires—it’s a referendum on how transformative AI technology should be developed and governed. The unsealed documents paint a picture of an industry moving at breakneck speed, where personal relationships, massive capital requirements, and existential concerns about AI’s future collide. What’s particularly striking is how funding pressures drove OpenAI’s transformation from nonprofit to for-profit, a path many AI safety advocates warned against. The diary entries and private communications reveal that financial considerations—not just mission—heavily influenced key decisions. As AI capabilities accelerate and require ever-larger investments, this tension between open research and commercial viability will only intensify. The March trial could fundamentally reshape expectations around AI governance and accountability, potentially influencing how future AI organizations structure themselves and honor their founding commitments.
Why This Matters
This lawsuit and the unsealed documents provide critical insights into the governance challenges facing AI companies as they navigate the tension between nonprofit missions and commercial imperatives. The case highlights fundamental questions about AI development: Should transformative AI technology be developed by nonprofits focused on benefiting humanity, or do for-profit structures better enable the massive investments required?
The documents reveal how personal relationships and power dynamics shape the AI industry’s trajectory. The friction between Musk and Altman, two of AI’s most influential figures, demonstrates how leadership conflicts can impact organizations developing potentially civilization-altering technology.
For the broader AI ecosystem, this case could set important legal precedents regarding nonprofit-to-profit transitions and founder obligations. The March trial will be closely watched by AI companies, investors, and policymakers as they grapple with questions of AI governance, funding models, and accountability. The revelations also underscore the intense competition among tech giants—Microsoft, Google, Amazon—to dominate AI development, with billions of dollars and strategic positioning at stake.
Related Stories
- Elon Musk’s $97B OpenAI Bid: Strategic Move or Elaborate Troll?
- OpenAI Lost Nearly Half of Its AI Safety Team, Ex-Researcher Says
- Sam Altman and Jony Ive Partner on AI Device, Target $1B Funding
- Microsoft’s Satya Nadella on OpenAI Partnership: Competition and Collaboration
- OpenAI’s Competition Sparks Investor Anxiety Over Talent Retention at Microsoft, Meta, and Google
Source: https://www.businessinsider.com/elon-musk-sam-altman-lawsuit-unsealed-documents-top-takeaways-2026-1