Meta’s turbulent 2025 has been defined by what CEO Mark Zuckerberg called a “year of intensity,” marked by dramatic cultural shifts, massive layoffs, and a fundamental pivot toward artificial intelligence. Business Insider reporter Pranav Dixit, who has covered Meta for the past year, reveals an organization undergoing simultaneous reinvention of its business model, values, and workplace culture.
The year began with sweeping policy changes including the elimination of third-party fact-checking, DEI program rollbacks, and an embrace of what the company termed “masculine” energy—moves that aligned Meta more closely with the Trump administration. This was followed by thousands of layoffs targeting employees labeled as low performers, creating what Dixit describes as a “pervasive survival mindset” where workers focused on avoiding the bottom performance tier rather than pursuing excellence.
The second half of 2025 brought Meta’s dramatic AI strategy reset. The company effectively acknowledged that its Llama AI model hadn’t met expectations and pivoted to a new mission: building “personal superintelligence.” This transformation included hiring AI executive Alexandr Wang, reorganizing artificial intelligence efforts under the newly created Meta Superintelligence Labs, and aggressively recruiting AI talent. Notably, high-profile departures included Yann LeCun, one of AI’s most respected researchers.
Dixit’s reporting with colleague Jyoti Mann uncovered troubling management practices tied to Meta’s forced ranking system, which requires designating a set percentage of employees as “low performers.” Some managers reportedly gamed the system by hiring people specifically to fill low-performance slots, avoiding backfilling roles, or creating positions with impossible expectations to protect existing team members.
Despite the turmoil, Meta employees remain divided: some have left on principle, saying the company no longer resembles what they joined, while others maintain it’s still the best job in tech, citing exceptional pay, product challenges, and unmatched scale. Looking ahead to 2026, the critical question is whether Meta’s massive AI capital expenditure will translate into sustainable business results and whether the company can retain the AI talent it’s betting its future on.
Key Quotes
Intense is the only way to describe it — exactly what Mark Zuckerberg promised employees.
Pranav Dixit, Business Insider reporter covering Meta, summarizing the company’s year of dramatic transformation including cultural shifts, layoffs, and AI reorganization.
Over and over, employees told us the goal wasn’t to do great work — it was to avoid landing in the bottom performance tier.
Dixit describing the survival mindset that has taken hold at Meta, where forced ranking systems have created a culture of fear rather than innovation among employees.
Meta effectively admitted Llama hadn’t lived up to the hype and reset around a new mission: building ‘personal superintelligence.’
Dixit explaining Meta’s mid-year AI strategy pivot, which involved acknowledging the limitations of its Llama model and reorganizing around a more ambitious superintelligence goal.
The big question is whether Meta’s massive AI spend becomes a durable business or an expensive experiment.
Dixit identifying the critical challenge facing Meta in 2026: whether billions in AI capital expenditure will generate actual revenue and profit, or prove to be an unsustainable investment.
Our Take
Meta’s situation exemplifies the existential pressures facing Big Tech in the AI era. The company is essentially running two parallel experiments: can extreme performance pressure drive AI innovation, and can massive capital investment in AI infrastructure generate returns before investor patience runs out? The departure of Yann LeCun and the admission that Llama underperformed suggest Meta’s AI strategy faces serious challenges. The “personal superintelligence” pivot sounds ambitious but also vague—potentially a sign of strategic uncertainty. Most concerning is the gaming of performance systems, which suggests Meta’s culture is optimizing for survival rather than innovation. History shows that companies rarely innovate their way out of problems when employees are primarily focused on not getting fired. Meta’s 2026 performance will likely determine whether aggressive restructuring and AI betting represents visionary leadership or a cautionary tale about unsustainable intensity.
Why This Matters
Meta’s transformation represents a pivotal moment in the AI industry’s evolution as one of tech’s biggest players makes an all-in bet on artificial intelligence. The company’s shift from its Llama model to “personal superintelligence” signals both the high stakes and uncertainty surrounding current AI development strategies. Meta’s massive capital expenditure on AI infrastructure reflects the industry-wide arms race, where companies are investing billions before clear monetization paths emerge.
The cultural upheaval at Meta also highlights broader tensions in tech: how companies balance innovation with employee wellbeing, whether aggressive performance management drives or destroys innovation, and whether the current pace of AI development is sustainable. Meta’s ability to retain top AI talent while maintaining intense performance pressure will serve as a bellwether for the entire industry. If Meta’s approach succeeds, expect other tech giants to follow suit. If it fails—through talent exodus or failed AI monetization—it could force a industry-wide recalibration of AI investment strategies and workplace culture.
Related Stories
- What Zuckerberg Risks by Following Musk’s Lead
- Big Tech’s 2025 AI Plans: Meta, Apple, Tesla, Google Unveil Roadmap
- Meta and Nvidia Billionaires’ Wealth Soars $152B in AI Boom
- Zuckerberg: White House Pressured Facebook on COVID-19 Content
- OpenAI’s Competition Sparks Investor Anxiety Over Talent Retention at Microsoft, Meta, and Google
Source: https://www.businessinsider.com/surviving-meta-year-of-intensity-2025-12