Marc Andreessen, venture capitalist and cofounder of Andreessen Horowitz, is pushing back against widespread fears that artificial intelligence will eliminate jobs. In a recent episode of “Lenny’s Podcast” released Thursday, Andreessen argued that the real economic threat isn’t AI-driven job displacement—it’s what would happen to the global economy without AI.
According to Andreessen, without major technological advancement through AI, the world faces “a future of depopulation” where shrinking workforces and stagnant productivity growth would cause economies to contract. For approximately two decades, productivity growth in advanced economies has been unusually weak by historical standards, slowing further after the 2008 global financial crisis despite rapid digital technology advances.
The demographic challenge is equally concerning. Birth rates across the United States, Europe, China, and much of the developed world have remained below the replacement level of about 2.1 children per woman—the threshold needed to maintain stable populations. “Depopulation without new technology would just mean that the economy shrinks,” Andreessen stated.
Andreessen’s perspective aligns with warnings from tech leaders like Elon Musk, who has repeatedly highlighted the economic risks of population decline—a threat that the US and Europe have attempted to address through pro-natal policies. In Andreessen’s view, AI arrives at precisely the right moment to offset the declining workforce. Rather than displacing workers en masse, artificial intelligence will help compensate for the shortage of available workers.
While Andreessen acknowledges that AI will reshape work at the task level, automating portions of roles across engineering, design, and product management, he firmly rejects predictions of widespread permanent unemployment. This puts him at odds with several senior AI researchers, including Geoffrey Hinton (often called the “godfather of AI”), computer science professor Roman Yampolskiy, and UC Berkeley professor Stuart Russell, who have made varying predictions about AI-driven job displacement.
Andreessen argues that even dramatic productivity increases would only return the economy to job churn levels seen during earlier industrial booms—periods remembered as times of opportunity rather than collapse. He expects human labor to become more valuable as populations shrink and immigration slows: “The remaining human workers are going to be at a premium, not at a discount.”
In scenarios where AI drives massive productivity gains, Andreessen predicts falling prices across goods and services, effectively raising living standards even if some jobs disappear. “That’s the equivalent of giving everybody a giant raise,” he concluded.
Key Quotes
If we didn’t have AI, we’d be in a panic right now about what’s going to happen to the economy.
Marc Andreessen made this statement on “Lenny’s Podcast,” arguing that without AI’s technological boost, the world would face severe economic contraction due to depopulation and stagnant productivity—a perspective that reframes AI as an economic savior rather than a threat.
Depopulation without new technology would just mean that the economy shrinks.
Andreessen emphasized the demographic crisis facing developed nations, where birth rates have fallen below replacement levels. This quote underscores his argument that AI is necessary to compensate for shrinking workforces rather than being a job-killing technology.
The remaining human workers are going to be at a premium, not at a discount.
Contrary to fears of AI devaluing human labor, Andreessen predicts that as populations shrink and AI increases productivity, human workers will become more valuable and sought-after, suggesting workers may gain rather than lose economic leverage in an AI-driven economy.
That’s the equivalent of giving everybody a giant raise.
Andreessen described how AI-driven productivity gains could lower prices across goods and services, effectively increasing purchasing power and living standards even if some job displacement occurs—presenting AI advancement as broadly beneficial to society.
Our Take
Andreessen’s optimistic take on AI deserves scrutiny but shouldn’t be dismissed. While his venture capital position creates inherent bias toward promoting AI adoption, the demographic and productivity data he cites are legitimate concerns that economists have documented for years. The critical question isn’t whether AI will change work—it clearly will—but whether those changes will be managed equitably.
The tension between Andreessen’s view and warnings from AI researchers like Geoffrey Hinton highlights a fundamental uncertainty about AI’s trajectory and speed of advancement. Andreessen may be correct that AI solves more problems than it creates, but the transition period could still be extremely disruptive for millions of workers. The real challenge lies in ensuring that productivity gains translate into broadly shared prosperity rather than concentrating wealth among AI owners and operators. Policymakers and business leaders must focus on education, retraining, and social safety nets to make Andreessen’s optimistic scenario a reality rather than a techno-utopian fantasy.
Why This Matters
This perspective from one of Silicon Valley’s most influential venture capitalists represents a significant counternarrative to widespread AI anxiety. As artificial intelligence rapidly advances and becomes integrated into business operations worldwide, the debate over its economic impact has intensified. Andreessen’s argument reframes AI not as a job destroyer but as an economic necessity—a crucial tool for addressing the demographic and productivity crises facing developed nations.
The intersection of AI advancement and demographic decline is becoming increasingly critical for policymakers and business leaders. With birth rates falling below replacement levels across major economies and productivity growth stagnating for two decades, the economic challenges Andreessen identifies are real and measurable. His view suggests that resistance to AI adoption could be more economically damaging than embracing it.
This matters for businesses planning their AI strategies and workers considering their career futures. If Andreessen’s thesis proves correct, the focus should shift from preventing AI adoption to managing the transition and ensuring workers can adapt to AI-augmented roles. It also suggests that human workers may gain bargaining power in an AI-enhanced economy rather than lose it, fundamentally changing how we should prepare for the AI-driven future.
Related Stories
- The Dangers of AI Labor Displacement
- The Future of Work in an AI World
- Business Leaders Share Top 3 AI Workforce Predictions for 2025
- AI’s Role in Tech Hiring Freeze: White-Collar Job Market Slump
- Tailwind CEO Blames AI for 75% Engineering Layoffs, 80% Revenue Drop
Source: https://www.businessinsider.com/marc-andreessen-says-ai-wont-kill-jobs-may-save-economy-2026-1