Intel is facing a critical juncture as it loses its 25-year position in the Dow Jones Industrial Average to Nvidia, highlighting the company’s struggles in the generative AI era. Intel’s stock has plummeted nearly 50% in 2024, accompanied by billions in losses, sweeping layoffs, and strategic setbacks that have raised questions about America’s semiconductor manufacturing future.
The core issue: Intel has significantly lagged behind competitors like Nvidia, Qualcomm, and AMD in the age of generative AI. These rivals have their chips manufactured by Taiwan-based giant TSMC, while Intel remains the only company producing high-powered chips on American soil at scale. This unique position makes Intel crucial to US technological independence and national security, as lawmakers worry about overseas chip dependency creating geopolitical vulnerabilities.
Industry analysts identify three critical factors for Intel’s recovery:
First, the 18A process technology represents Intel’s next major opportunity. After struggling with previous node upgrades, Intel has executed five improved chip nodes in four years, creating smaller and more powerful transistors. Patrick Moorhead, CEO of Moor Insights and Strategy, notes that Intel’s 18A node “appears to be healthy and competitive, which is the key to its turnaround.” Amazon has already signed on as an 18A customer, but Intel needs to prove it can manufacture chips efficiently and on time—something it hasn’t consistently achieved.
Second, Intel’s foundry spin-off strategy involves separating its semiconductor manufacturing business into an independent subsidiary called Intel Foundry. This separation of manufacturing from chip design could unlock significant value—potentially $80 billion according to Dan Morgan of Synovus. However, success requires attracting major customers, including rivals, to manufacture their designs at Intel facilities in large volumes. CEO Pat Gelsinger reports progress on cost-cutting through staff reductions and real estate sales, though the foundry business continues posting losses.
Third, government support under the CHIPS and Science Act promises billions in federal funding, though Intel hasn’t received funds yet. Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo has reportedly held private meetings urging tech giants like Google, Microsoft, Apple, and Nvidia to buy Intel chips. The incoming Trump administration may provide additional support for domestic manufacturing, though analysts remain skeptical about whether government intervention alone can solve Intel’s technical challenges.
Despite the struggles, Intel maintains over 75% market share in data center chips and PCs, suggesting the company isn’t in immediate existential danger. However, if the turnaround fails, potential outcomes include business breakups, with competitors like Qualcomm reportedly interested in acquiring parts of Intel, or mergers with companies like AMD or Marvell.
Key Quotes
Chips power the modern economy. If you have to get these components overseas, you’re vulnerable.
Business Insider’s Alistair Barr emphasized the strategic importance of domestic chip manufacturing, explaining why Intel’s role as America’s only large-scale advanced chip manufacturer makes its struggles a national concern beyond just corporate performance.
What’s going on in Intel is not good, and being removed from the Dow is just sort of the cherry on the sundae.
Stacy Rasgon, senior analyst at Bernstein Research, captured the severity of Intel’s situation, noting that losing its Dow Jones position after 25 years represents the culmination of multiple setbacks rather than an isolated incident.
Its 18A node appears to be healthy and competitive, which is the key to its turnaround and the ability to recruit more foundry customers.
Patrick Moorhead, CEO of Moor Insights and Strategy, identified Intel’s 18A process technology as the critical factor that could reverse the company’s fortunes if it successfully delivers on its technical promises and attracts major manufacturing customers.
It’s all fine and dandy for the government to say, ‘Yeah, we want you to use Intel.’ Like, that’s great, but it’s not going to happen unless Intel can deliver.
Analyst Stacy Rasgon expressed skepticism about government intervention’s effectiveness, emphasizing that political pressure on tech companies to support Intel won’t succeed unless the company can match competitors on technology, efficiency, and reliability.
Our Take
Intel’s predicament reveals a harsh truth about the AI revolution: legacy advantages evaporate quickly when paradigm shifts occur. Intel dominated the PC and data center era but missed the architectural innovations that make Nvidia’s GPUs superior for AI workloads. The company’s integrated manufacturing model—once a competitive moat—became an anchor when fabless competitors could access TSMC’s cutting-edge processes without capital-intensive factory investments.
The government’s dilemma is equally instructive. National security concerns can’t override market realities. Even with CHIPS Act funding and political pressure, Intel must deliver competitive technology. The 18A node represents a genuine technical achievement, but one successful process node doesn’t guarantee sustained competitiveness against TSMC’s relentless innovation cycle.
Most significantly, Intel’s struggle demonstrates how AI has become the organizing principle for semiconductor value creation. Companies optimized for AI workloads command premium valuations while traditional chipmakers face existential questions. Intel’s recovery depends not just on manufacturing excellence but on proving relevance in an AI-first computing landscape—a far more daunting challenge than fixing production processes.
Why This Matters
Intel’s struggle represents a critical inflection point for American technological sovereignty and the global AI race. As the only US-based manufacturer of advanced chips at scale, Intel’s fate directly impacts national security and economic competitiveness in an era where AI capabilities increasingly determine geopolitical power.
The company’s difficulties underscore the massive competitive advantage that AI-focused chipmakers like Nvidia have established. Nvidia’s ascension to the Dow Jones while Intel exits symbolizes the market’s recognition that AI infrastructure—not traditional computing—drives future value creation.
For the broader tech ecosystem, Intel’s recovery or failure will shape supply chain resilience and innovation velocity. If Intel successfully executes its 18A technology and foundry strategy, it could democratize advanced chip manufacturing and reduce dependence on Taiwan-based production amid rising geopolitical tensions. Conversely, failure could leave the US vulnerable to supply disruptions and accelerate China’s semiconductor ambitions.
The situation also highlights how rapidly AI has transformed the semiconductor landscape, rewarding companies that anticipated generative AI’s computational demands while punishing those that didn’t pivot quickly enough. Intel’s next moves will determine whether established tech giants can adapt to AI-driven disruption or whether nimbler competitors will dominate the next computing era.
Recommended Reading
For those interested in learning more about artificial intelligence, machine learning, and effective AI communication, here are some excellent resources:
Recommended Reading
Related Stories
- Jensen Huang: TSMC Helped Fix Design Flaw with Nvidia’s Blackwell AI Chip
- Biden hails $20B investment by computer chip maker in Arizona plant
- EnCharge AI Secures $100M Series B to Revolutionize Energy-Efficient AI Chips
- Pitch Deck: TensorWave raises $10M to build safer AI compute chips for Nvidia and AMD
Source: https://www.businessinsider.com/intel-dow-jones-ai-chip-lag-2024-11