Google faced significant internal backlash after removing its pledge not to use artificial intelligence for weapons development from its AI principles. The company’s decision to quietly update its AI principles by removing explicit language about weapons development has sparked controversy among employees who view this as a concerning shift in ethical standards. The original principles, established in 2018 following employee protests over Project Maven (a Pentagon AI contract), specifically stated Google would not develop AI for weapons. The updated version now uses broader language about avoiding AI applications that cause overall harm. Employees expressed their concerns through internal forums and communications, with many viewing this change as a potential signal that Google might be open to military AI contracts. The timing of this modification is particularly notable as it coincides with increased competition in the AI industry and growing interest from defense departments worldwide in AI technology. Several current and former employees highlighted how this change contradicts Google’s original ethical stance and could damage trust both internally and externally. The controversy reflects broader tensions in the tech industry regarding the ethical implications of AI development and its potential military applications. While Google maintains its commitment to responsible AI development, the removal of specific weapons-related language has raised questions about the company’s future direction and its willingness to engage with military contracts.