Former Google CEO Eric Schmidt is making bold predictions about the future of warfare, declaring that AI-powered drones will fundamentally transform how conflicts are fought. Schmidt, who led Google from 2001 to 2011, has moved from tech executive to defense entrepreneur as the founder of White Stork, an AI drone startup that has already supplied Ukraine with autonomous drones for its ongoing war with Russia.
At a Stanford lecture in August, Schmidt revealed that his involvement in the defense industry had turned him into a “licensed arms dealer,” with White Stork’s goal being to use AI “in complicated, powerful ways.” The company is now at the forefront of developing autonomous drones for the US military, alongside Palmer Luckey’s Anduril.
Schmidt’s vision for future warfare is stark: humans should be positioned far from the front lines, operating AI-controlled machines remotely that conduct the actual fighting. Speaking to PBS, he called using armed soldiers on the battlefield an “antiquated method of war.” Instead, Schmidt advocates for a model where “the people [are] well behind and have the weapons well up front, and have them networked and controlled by AI.”
At a tech conference in Saudi Arabia in October, Schmidt demonstrated the cost-effectiveness of drone warfare, calling tanks “useless” and noting that a $5,000 drone could destroy a $5 million American tank. This dramatic shift in military economics underscores why autonomous drones are rapidly becoming central to defense strategies.
However, Schmidt emphasizes the critical importance of maintaining “human in the loop” protocols for AI drones, ensuring meaningful human control over battlefield decisions. He envisions a system where “the computer will produce the battle plan and the human will authorize it,” providing both legitimacy and accountability. This human oversight is essential to preventing what Schmidt calls a “Dr. Strangelove situation,” where autonomous weapons make life-or-death decisions independently—a scenario he describes as “terrible.”
Scott Sacknoff, president of aerospace and defense investment firm Spade Index, confirmed that autonomous drones in warfare are “definitely a trend,” noting that the defense sector undergoes technological transformation cycles every 20 years. He predicts that as autonomous drone technology advances, counter-innovations to stop them will inevitably emerge, continuing the perpetual arms race that characterizes military development.
Key Quotes
The correct model, and obviously war is horrific, is to have the people well behind and have the weapons well up front, and have them networked and controlled by AI. The future of war is AI, networked drones of many different kinds.
Eric Schmidt told PBS his vision for future warfare, emphasizing the shift from human soldiers on front lines to AI-controlled drone networks. This statement encapsulates the fundamental transformation Schmidt envisions for military operations.
What will happen is that the computer will produce the battle plan and the human will authorize it, thereby giving the legitimacy of both authorizing it as a human but also the legitimacy of control and liability if they make a mistake.
Schmidt explained his “human in the loop” philosophy, describing how AI and human decision-making should work together in warfare. This addresses critical concerns about accountability and control in autonomous weapons systems.
That would be terrible.
Schmidt’s response to the possibility of a “Dr. Strangelove situation” where autonomous weapons make decisions independently. Despite his advocacy for AI drones, Schmidt clearly draws a line at fully autonomous killing machines without human oversight.
Every 20 years, the defense sector sort of goes through a cycle where here are the new technologies that will have a greater impact on defense and military.
Scott Sacknoff of Spade Index provided industry context, suggesting that AI drones represent the latest transformational technology cycle in military history, comparable to previous innovations like radar, missiles, or stealth technology.
Our Take
Schmidt’s transition from Google CEO to defense entrepreneur reveals how deeply AI is penetrating every sector, including the most consequential: warfare. His White Stork venture represents a broader trend of Silicon Valley talent and capital flowing into defense tech, reversing decades of separation between tech companies and military applications. The economic argument he presents is compelling but raises troubling questions about an AI arms race where nations rush to deploy autonomous weapons before fully understanding their implications. Schmidt’s insistence on human oversight is reassuring but potentially naive—in the heat of battle, with AI systems operating at machine speed, will meaningful human control remain practical? The pressure to remove humans from the decision loop for speed advantages could prove irresistible. This story ultimately highlights AI’s dual nature: tremendously powerful and potentially transformative, yet requiring careful governance to prevent catastrophic outcomes. The decisions made today about military AI will echo for generations.
Why This Matters
This story represents a pivotal moment in both AI development and military strategy, as one of Silicon Valley’s most influential figures transitions from consumer technology to defense applications. Schmidt’s involvement legitimizes and accelerates the integration of AI into warfare, potentially reshaping global military dynamics for decades to come.
The implications extend beyond the battlefield. The economic argument Schmidt presents—$5,000 drones destroying $5 million tanks—could fundamentally alter defense spending priorities and military procurement strategies worldwide. This shift may redirect billions in defense budgets toward AI and autonomous systems, creating massive opportunities for tech companies while potentially destabilizing traditional defense contractors.
The “human in the loop” debate Schmidt highlights is crucial for AI ethics and governance more broadly. How militaries implement human oversight of AI systems will likely influence civilian AI regulation, setting precedents for autonomous decision-making in healthcare, transportation, and other critical sectors. Schmidt’s emphasis on preventing autonomous weapons from operating independently reflects growing concerns about AI safety and control that extend far beyond military applications, making this a defining issue for the entire AI industry.
Recommended Reading
For those interested in learning more about artificial intelligence, machine learning, and effective AI communication, here are some excellent resources: