Major Canadian media companies have launched a significant legal battle against OpenAI, accusing the artificial intelligence giant of systematically stealing copyrighted news content to train its ChatGPT language models. The coalition of plaintiffs includes Torstar, Postmedia, The Globe and Mail, The Canadian Press, and CBC/Radio-Canada—representing some of Canada’s most prominent news organizations.
Filed on Friday in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, the 84-page lawsuit alleges that OpenAI has “engaged in ongoing, deliberate, and unauthorized misappropriation” of their journalistic works. The media companies claim OpenAI violated Canadian copyright laws and “unjustly enriched” itself at the expense of the news industry by scraping vast amounts of content without permission or compensation.
The lawsuit seeks undisclosed damages to compensate for what the plaintiffs call “wrongful misappropriation” of their intellectual property, along with a permanent injunction to prevent OpenAI from continuing these practices. The news organizations argue that while journalism serves the public interest, OpenAI’s unauthorized commercial use of their content is both illegal and harmful to the industry.
In their joint statement, the media companies emphasized that “OpenAI is capitalizing and profiting from the use of this content, without getting permission or compensating content owners.” They allege the company “regularly breaches copyright and online terms of use by scraping large swaths of content from Canadian media” to develop products like ChatGPT.
OpenAI has defended its practices, with a spokesperson stating that its models are “trained on publicly available data, grounded in fair use and related international copyright principles that are fair for creators and support innovation.” The company emphasized its collaboration with news publishers, including displaying, attributing, and linking to their content in ChatGPT search features, while offering opt-out options.
This lawsuit represents the latest in a growing wave of legal challenges against AI companies over training data practices. Authors, visual artists, news outlets, and computer programmers have filed similar lawsuits against OpenAI and other AI firms. Notably, The New York Times sued OpenAI and Microsoft for copyright infringement in late 2023. However, some media organizations, including Axel Springer (Business Insider’s parent company), have taken a different approach by partnering with OpenAI and licensing their content for AI training purposes.
Key Quotes
OpenAI is capitalizing and profiting from the use of this content, without getting permission or compensating content owners. Journalism is in the public interest. OpenAI using other companies’ journalism for their own commercial gain is not. It’s illegal.
This statement from the joint media coalition encapsulates their core argument—that while journalism serves society, OpenAI’s unauthorized commercial exploitation of their work violates both legal and ethical boundaries.
Our models are trained on publicly available data, grounded in fair use and related international copyright principles that are fair for creators and support innovation.
An OpenAI spokesperson provided this defense of the company’s training practices, arguing their approach is legally sound under fair use doctrine and supports technological progress while remaining fair to content creators.
Rather than seek to obtain the information legally, OpenAI has elected to brazenly misappropriate the News Media Companies’ valuable intellectual property and convert it for its own uses, including commercial uses, without consent or consideration.
This allegation from the lawsuit characterizes OpenAI’s actions as deliberate and willful, suggesting the company chose to bypass legal channels for obtaining content rights in favor of unauthorized scraping.
Our Take
This lawsuit underscores the fundamental tension between AI innovation and intellectual property rights that will define the next phase of the AI revolution. The Canadian media coalition’s aggressive legal stance—particularly their characterization of OpenAI’s actions as “brazen”—suggests they view this as an existential fight for their industry’s survival. What makes this case particularly significant is the unified front presented by major Canadian news organizations, demonstrating industry-wide concern about AI’s impact on journalism’s economic viability. The contrasting approaches—some outlets suing while others like Axel Springer partner with OpenAI—reveal the industry’s uncertainty about the best path forward. Ultimately, courts will need to balance fostering AI innovation against protecting creators’ rights, a decision that will reverberate far beyond Canada’s borders and shape how AI companies source training data globally.
Why This Matters
This lawsuit represents a critical inflection point in the ongoing debate over AI training data and copyright law. As generative AI becomes increasingly central to the technology industry, the question of whether companies can freely use copyrighted content for training purposes has enormous implications for both the AI and media industries.
For the struggling news industry, this case could establish important legal precedents about compensation for content used in AI training, potentially creating new revenue streams at a time when traditional journalism faces existential economic challenges. A favorable ruling could force AI companies to negotiate licensing agreements, fundamentally changing their business models and development costs.
For the AI industry, an adverse ruling could significantly increase operational costs and slow innovation, as companies would need to secure permissions and pay for training data. This could advantage larger companies with resources to negotiate deals while disadvantaging startups and open-source projects.
The case also highlights the global nature of AI regulation challenges, as different jurisdictions develop varying approaches to copyright and fair use in the AI context. The outcome in Canadian courts could influence legal strategies and regulatory approaches worldwide, making this a bellwether case for the future of AI development.
Recommended Reading
For those interested in learning more about artificial intelligence, machine learning, and effective AI communication, here are some excellent resources:
Recommended Reading
Related Stories
- Elon Musk Drops Lawsuit Against ChatGPT Maker OpenAI, No Explanation
- OpenAI CEO Sam Altman Hints at Potential Restructuring in 2024
- OpenAI’s Valuation Soars as AI Race Heats Up
- Photobucket is licensing your photos and images to train AI without your consent, and there’s no easy way to opt out
- Outlook Uncertain as US Government Pivots to Full AI Regulations