AI Investments Drive New Era of Employee Tracking in Tech

Silicon Valley has entered a new phase of workplace accountability, with major tech companies implementing unprecedented employee tracking systems to justify massive AI investments. According to Business Insider’s Tim Paradis, the industry’s latest mantra has shifted from efficiency and intensity to accountability, with companies demanding workers “show their work” in measurable ways.

Amazon is now helping managers track employees’ office attendance time, while Meta monitors workers’ AI usage patterns. This surveillance surge isn’t coincidental—it’s directly tied to the enormous capital being poured into artificial intelligence initiatives with unclear returns on investment. JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon’s recent plea to analysts to “just trust me” on AI spending exemplifies the pressure executives face from investors demanding proof of value.

The accountability trend extends beyond Big Tech. Citi CEO Jane Fraser warned employees in a recent memo that old work habits are no longer acceptable during the bank’s ongoing “Transformation” initiative. Everyone needs to demonstrate elevated performance through documented metrics.

This represents another way AI creates additional work for employees rather than reducing it. Companies investing billions in AI technology are now requiring human workers to produce extensive documentation proving their productivity and worth. One expert suggests a slightly optimistic interpretation: comprehensive data collection could help managers better justify their teams’ existence to cost-cutting executives.

However, metrics-driven management poses significant risks to innovation and creativity. While clear performance expectations can benefit employees during salary negotiations—“You asked for X, I delivered X+1”—constant measurement can stifle experimentation. Workers who discover successful formulas may become reluctant to deviate from proven strategies, even when innovation could yield better results.

The pressure to consistently hit numbers discourages the trial-and-error process essential to breakthrough thinking. Creativity rarely emerges from repetition, and understanding failures often leads to eventual success. But in an environment demanding constant proof of value, accumulating losses while pursuing innovative approaches becomes professionally dangerous, even if success is imminent.

Key Quotes

JPMorgan’s Jamie Dimon literally told analysts to just ’trust me.'

This quote illustrates the desperation among executives to justify massive AI investments when concrete returns remain elusive. Even major financial institutions struggle to demonstrate clear benefits from their AI spending, leading to appeals for faith rather than evidence.

Citi CEO Jane Fraser, who is in the midst of her own ‘Transformation,’ told workers in a recent memo that old habits won’t fly anymore and everyone needs to step up their game.

Fraser’s directive shows how the accountability trend extends beyond pure tech companies into financial services, where AI investments are driving demands for measurable employee performance improvements across entire organizations.

Creativity is rarely born from repetition. You often need to understand what doesn’t work to figure out what will work.

This observation captures the fundamental tension between metrics-driven accountability and innovation. The constant pressure to demonstrate value through consistent performance metrics may inadvertently suppress the experimental mindset necessary for breakthrough innovations.

Our Take

The accountability era reveals an uncomfortable truth about AI adoption: we’re experiencing the costs before realizing the benefits. Companies are essentially hedging their AI bets by extracting maximum measurable productivity from human workers, creating a surveillance infrastructure that may outlast any AI implementation challenges. This approach fundamentally misunderstands innovation—breakthrough ideas emerge from environments that tolerate failure and encourage experimentation, not from constant performance monitoring. The real risk is that excessive accountability creates a culture of risk-aversion precisely when companies need bold thinking to successfully integrate AI. We may be witnessing a self-defeating cycle where AI investments drive employee tracking that stifles the innovation needed to make those AI investments worthwhile. The question isn’t whether workers can prove their value—it’s whether companies are creating conditions where valuable work can actually happen.

Why This Matters

This development reveals a critical tension in the AI revolution: companies are spending unprecedented amounts on artificial intelligence while simultaneously increasing surveillance of human workers to justify those investments. The irony is stark—AI promised to augment human capabilities and reduce busywork, yet it’s creating new administrative burdens and performance anxiety.

The shift toward metrics-based accountability has profound implications for innovation in the tech sector. When employees face constant pressure to demonstrate measurable productivity, they’re less likely to take creative risks or explore unconventional solutions. This could slow the very innovation that AI investments are supposed to accelerate.

For the broader workforce, this trend signals that AI adoption may intensify workplace monitoring rather than liberate workers from oversight. As companies struggle to show ROI on AI spending, human employees become the variable that must prove its value. This creates a paradox where the technology meant to enhance human work instead puts jobs under greater scrutiny, potentially accelerating automation decisions when workers can’t demonstrate sufficient “accountability.”

Source: https://www.businessinsider.com/bi-newsletter-big-tech-employee-tracking-oversight-2026-1