The U.S. Copyright Office has released new guidance regarding AI-assisted works, emphasizing that human authorship remains essential for copyright protection. The guidance clarifies that works created solely by AI without human creative input cannot be copyrighted, while those combining human creativity with AI assistance may be eligible for partial protection. The office will focus on the human author’s creative contribution when evaluating copyright claims. The guidance specifically addresses various scenarios, including AI-generated text, artwork, and music, stating that humans must engage in creative expression rather than merely providing prompts to AI systems. Works containing both AI and human-created elements may be eligible for copyright protection, but only for the human-authored portions. The office will require transparency from applicants about AI’s role in creation, with clear disclosure of AI-generated content. This guidance comes as courts and policymakers grapple with AI’s impact on intellectual property rights. Notable cases include litigation involving AI-generated images and artwork, highlighting the complex intersection of AI technology and copyright law. The office’s position reinforces the fundamental principle that copyright law is designed to protect human creativity while adapting to technological advances. This framework aims to balance innovation in AI technology with traditional copyright protections, ensuring that human creative expression remains at the core of copyright law.